MORE MEDIMEDIA SITES:
→ Managed Care Journal
→ P&T Community
→ CE University

Search Biotechnology Healthcare site: 
Home Journal News Supplements P&T Digest
Recent Issues
2010
Spring
Summer

2009
April
June
August
October/November
Winter 2009–2010

2008
May/June
July/August
September/October
November/December

2007
February
April
June
August
October
December

2006
February
April
June
August
October
December

2005
February
April
June
August
October
December

2004
March
May
July/August
September
October
December
About Biotechnology Healthcare Journal
Rate Card
Production Specifications
Call for Papers
Conflict-of-interest form (PDF)
Writers’ Guidelines
Masthead
Editorial Board
Subscriptions
Reprints

October/November 2009

Features

Cover Story

Satisfaction Guaranteed
Or Your Money Back

The pitch is as American as Mom and apple pie, and some biotechs and pharmaceutical companies are using it — or something similar — in their contracts with payers. Although more common in Europe, these so-called ‘risk-sharing contracts’ are attracting renewed interest in the United States.

Risk sharing is an old idea that has taken many forms in the era of ­managed care. But with the emergence of high-cost biopharmaceuticals, payers and purchasers are keen on a new twist: putting the onus on manufacturers to prove that their products are as good as advertised. Popular in Europe, risk-sharing contracts are gaining traction in the United States.
Bob Carlson, MHA
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Clinical

A Crash Course

Researchers raced to fight the H1N1 pandemic, but translating knowledge to practice has proven to be difficult. Manufacturing capabilities have been hindered, distribution strategies have to be clarified, and public misconceptions need to be dispelled.
John Carroll
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Influenza Vaccination: Financial Burden Or Public Health Solution?

Influenza drives up both direct and indirect costs for employers. Vaccinating employees can help with prevention, but the answer to keeping costs down may be herd immunity.

Influenza drives up employers’ costs. Herd protection may justify the cost of a vaccine.
Marina V. Zeltser, BA
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Regulation

FTC Versus Congress: The Biosimilars Debate

A Federal Trade Commission report dismissed the need for a period of market exclusivity for brand-name biologics that may face follow-on competition. The authors argue that the FTC’s conclusion — that patent protection alone will fuel biotech R&D after passage of follow-on legislation — is shaky.

Two patent lawyers challenge the FTC’s stance that biologics need no market exclusivity.
Kathleen Carr and Thomas Wintner
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Specialty Pharmacy

Specialty Drugs: A Rich Pipeline that Needs to be Managed

Health plans will experience increasing demands as specialty drugs are used for more ­common conditions. The author discusses ways to manage the ever-changing terrain.
Keith Bradbury
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Benefit Design

Value-Based Insurance Design

As the healthcare debate waged on, many argued that VBID should be an essential component of reform. Payers and purchasers are looking to understand how VBID fits into the way services are chosen and paid for, maximizing the care given for the money spent.
Lola Butcher
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Departments

Openers

Does Healthcare Warrant a Warranty?

Some things left out of healthcare reform.
Michael D. Dalzell
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Editorial

In Time for Nanotech

David B. Nash, MD, MBA
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Personalized Medicine

Gene Patents on the Line

Bob Carlson, MHA
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Drug Track

Research, Conferences, and FDA Actions

Amy Rossi
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Specialty Pharmacy

Proper Patient Identification: The First Step to Healthcare Reform?

How patient selection might dovetail with a key aspect of healthcare reform efforts.
Amy Rossi
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Biologics and Benefits

Are Employers Ready for the Oncology Pipeline?

John Carroll
DIGITAL  |  PDF

Trends

Can Higher PMPY Costs Be a Good Thing?

Amy Rossi
DIGITAL  |  PDF